Two matching audit formats
Evidence-linked Markdown for people and deterministic JSON for internal tooling, both naming the same immutable revision.
← WrightOps services
Human-reviewed · one public repository
Know what your coding agents can trust.
A fixed-scope operational evidence audit pinned to one immutable GitHub revision—before your team changes the repository.
$750 USD · Three business days after complete public inputs and provider-confirmed settled payment.
Evidence score
90/100
- Agent instructions
- 20/20
- Verification automation
- 15/15
- Runtime configuration
- 0/10
- Risky-action boundaries
- 10/10
revision 7a507bc…1b37b5f
Scope
1 public GitHub repository
Outputs
Markdown + JSON
Priorities
Up to 5 reviewed findings
Handoff
30 minutes
The delivery
Evidence your team can inspect—not a confidence score in isolation.
Every positive finding points back to public source evidence at the reviewed revision. Missing evidence stays missing instead of becoming a guess.
Human-reviewed priorities
Up to five repository-specific next steps, ordered by the operational pain named in the accepted scope.
A bounded handoff
Thirty recorded or live minutes to walk through evidence, limitations, acceptance criteria, and the smallest useful next step.
-
01
README and setup guidance
Can an agent find an actionable starting point and executable-looking setup guidance?
-
02
Coding-agent instructions
Does the repository expose recognized, inspectable instructions rather than local-only conventions?
-
03
Runtime configuration
Are required environment inputs named without leaking real secrets—or explicitly unnecessary?
-
04
Continuous integration
Can a contributor locate public automation that verifies changes at the reviewed revision?
-
05
Issue and pull-request templates
Are contribution inputs and review expectations made explicit in public repository artifacts?
-
06
Verification commands
Are test, lint, build, or other acceptance commands discoverable and tied to evidence?
-
07
Risky-action boundaries
Can an agent tell which actions require approval and which systems or data remain out of scope?
The process
Scope first. Settle second. Review third.
-
01
Send a non-binding scope request
Use the public GitHub form or the prefilled WrightOps business email. Provide one canonical public repository, confirm your authority, name the workflow pain, and choose a recorded or live handoff. Do not send private or payment data.
-
02
Receive written scope
WrightOps confirms the immutable revision, outputs, exclusions, timing, acceptance criteria, and handoff format before sharing the existing PayPal Business Goods & Services checkout.
-
03
Payment settles
Work begins only after PayPal reports a settled payment and all required public inputs are complete—not on a checkout visit, authorization, pending payment, hold, or invoice.
-
04
Inspect the delivery
Receive the matching reports, reviewed priorities, source links, stated limitations, and 30-minute handoff within three business days.
The boundary is part of the product
Operational readiness only.
This is not a vulnerability, security, privacy, legal, or compliance assessment. The service does not inspect private systems, execute repository code, or make changes to the target.
Read complete service and refund terms- ✓ Public GitHub repositories only
- ✓ One immutable default-branch revision
- ✓ Public source links for positive findings
- × No credentials, private code, or customer data
- × No production or deployment access
- × No guaranteed score, adoption, or business outcome
- × No remediation or ongoing monitoring
Before you request scope
Direct answers.
Is opening the public request a contract?
No. A GitHub issue or scope email creates no payment obligation. WrightOps must confirm the exact written scope before sharing checkout.
Do I need a GitHub account to request scope?
No. The prefilled business-email path asks for the same public-only scope and authority confirmation without GitHub sign-in. Never include credentials, payment details, private files, personal data, customer data, or production access.
Can the audit review a private repository?
No. The fixed service uses only one public GitHub repository and public evidence at one immutable revision.
Does the audit include implementation?
No. It provides evidence and priorities. Code changes, remediation, deployment, and ongoing monitoring are excluded.
What happens if WrightOps cannot deliver?
The full purchase price is refundable before work begins or if WrightOps cannot deliver the accepted scope. Refund execution remains owner-confirmed.
What should never be placed in the public request?
Never submit contact or payment details, credentials, secrets, private files, customer data, personal data, or production access.
One repository · one revision · inspectable proof
Find the operational gaps before your coding agents do.
Use the public scope form or the prefilled WrightOps business email. No payment is requested until WrightOps confirms the repository, revision, deliverables, exclusions, and timing.